You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
The Distortion of Cardinal Preferences in Voting
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 23 |
| Book title |
Cooperative Information Agents X
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/11839354_23 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-038569-1, 978-3-54-038570-7
|
| Authors |
Ariel D. Procaccia, Jeffrey S. Rosenschein, Procaccia, Ariel D., Rosenschein, Jeffrey S. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 8 | 53% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,490
of 8,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,442
of 67,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.