↓ Skip to main content

The Semantic Web

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'The Semantic Web'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Cross-Lingual Ontology Mapping – An Investigation of the Impact of Machine Translation
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Modeling Common Real-Word Relations Using Triples Extracted from n-Grams
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Supporting the Development of Data Wrapping Ontologies
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 A Conceptual Model for a Web-Scale Entity Name System
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 What Makes a Good Ontology? A Case-Study in Fine-Grained Knowledge Reuse
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Repairing the Missing is-a Structure of Ontologies
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Entity Resolution in Texts Using Statistical Learning and Ontologies
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 An Effective Similarity Propagation Method for Matching Ontologies without Sufficient or Regular Linguistic Information
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Deciding Query Entailment for Fuzzy $\mathcal{SHIN}$ Ontologies
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Merging and Ranking Answers in the Semantic Web: The Wisdom of Crowds
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 LODE: Linking Open Descriptions of Events
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A Semantic Wiki Based Light-Weight Web Application Model
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Guidelines for the Specification and Design of Large-Scale Semantic Applications
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Semantic-Linguistic Feature Vectors for Search: Unsupervised Construction and Experimental Validation
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Utilising Task-Patterns in Organisational Process Knowledge Sharing
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Reasoning about Partially Ordered Web Service Activities in PSL
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Two-Fold Service Matchmaking – Applying Ontology Mapping for Semantic Web Service Discovery
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 An Approach to Analyzing Dynamic Trustworthy Service Composition
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Improving Folksonomies Using Formal Knowledge: A Case Study on Search
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Querying the Web of Data: A Formal Approach
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 A Relevance-Directed Algorithm for Finding Justifications of DL Entailments
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Entropy-Based Metrics for Evaluating Schema Reuse
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Overcoming Schema Heterogeneity between Linked Semantic Repositories to Improve Coreference Resolution
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Social Semantic Rule Sharing and Querying in Wellness Communities
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Semantic Rules on Drug Discovery Data
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 RepOSE: An Environment for Repairing Missing Ontological Structure
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 SHARE: A Semantic Web Query Engine for Bioinformatics
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 IP-Explorer: A Semantic Web Based Intellectual Property Knowledge Base and Trading Platform
Attention for Chapter 11: LODE: Linking Open Descriptions of Events
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
LODE: Linking Open Descriptions of Events
Chapter number 11
Book title
The Semantic Web
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-10871-6_11
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-210870-9, 978-3-64-210871-6
Authors

Ryan Shaw, Raphaël Troncy, Lynda Hardman, Raphaël Troncy, Shaw, Ryan, Troncy, Raphaël, Hardman, Lynda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
United Kingdom 5 4%
Spain 3 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Ireland 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
France 2 2%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 89 74%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 27%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 10 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 93 77%
Arts and Humanities 6 5%
Linguistics 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 12 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2013.
All research outputs
#4,659,056
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,543
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,123
of 168,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#28
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.