↓ Skip to main content

Martin Davis on Computability, Computational Logic, and Mathematical Foundations

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Why Post Did [Not] Have Turing’s Thesis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Why Post Did [Not] Have Turing’s Thesis
Chapter number 7
Book title
Martin Davis on Computability, Computational Logic, and Mathematical Foundations
Published in
Outstanding Contributions to Logic, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-41842-1_7
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-941841-4, 978-3-31-941842-1
Authors

Wilfried Sieg, Máté Szabó, Dawn McLaughlin, Sieg, Wilfried, Szabó, Máté, McLaughlin, Dawn

Editors

Eugenio G. Omodeo, Alberto Policriti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#16,464,459
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Outstanding Contributions to Logic
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,958
of 428,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Outstanding Contributions to Logic
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them