↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary Dysfunction and Disease

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 21: Pertussis: History of the Disease and Current Prevention Failure
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Pertussis: History of the Disease and Current Prevention Failure
Chapter number 21
Book title
Pulmonary Dysfunction and Disease
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/5584_2016_21
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-942009-7, 978-3-31-942010-3
Authors

Kuchar, E., Karlikowska-Skwarnik, M., Han, S., Nitsch-Osuch, A., E. Kuchar, M. Karlikowska-Skwarnik, S. Han, A. Nitsch-Osuch

Abstract

Pertussis or whooping cough has been given many names over the centuries. It was first recognized in the Middle Ages and since then various epidemics have been described. Jules Bordet and Octave Gengou isolated Bordetella pertussis, a causative agent for whooping cough, in Paris more than 100 years ago, which created an excellent opportunity to invent a vaccine. In 1914 the whole-cell pertussis vaccine was invented, then in the 1940s it was combined with tetanus and diphtheria toxoids to become DTP and it became widely available. A successive decrease in the incidence of the disease has since been observed. The vaccine has been about 80 % effective in preventing serious disease and death from pertussis. The disadvantage is that the vaccine offers protection for 5-10 years after the last dose of the full vaccination course. The second issue is the question of how to prevent side effects of the whole-cell vaccine. In the 1990s, the acellular vaccine was introduced in the US and gradually replaced the whole-cell vaccine. About 10 years later, a possible failure with the new vaccine has been observed, that is a lack of long-term protection. Nowadays, both vaccines are used, with the acellular vaccine being vastly predominant in most developed countries. Pertussis incidence has increased since the 1980s, but new prevention strategies include booster doses for specific age groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 40 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 39 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,457,932
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#544
of 5,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,543
of 355,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#9
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.