You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Detection of Glymphatic Outflow of Tau from Brain to Cerebrospinal Fluid in Mice
|
---|---|
Book title |
Tau Protein
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-3629-9_19 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-163628-2, 978-1-07-163629-9
|
Authors |
Ishida, Kazuhisa, Yamada, Kaoru, Kazuhisa Ishida, Kaoru Yamada |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,878,557
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,307
of 14,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,234
of 157,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#9
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,263 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.