You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Origami: (un)folding the Abstraction of Recursion Schemes for Program Synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 14 |
| Book title |
Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XX
|
| Published in |
arXiv, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-981-99-8413-8_14 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-9-81-998412-1, 978-9-81-998413-8
|
| Authors |
Fernandes, Matheus Campos, de Franca, Fabricio Olivetti, Francesquini, Emilio, Matheus Campos Fernandes, Fabricio Olivetti de Franca, Emilio Francesquini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,198,310
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#144,244
of 916,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,580
of 335,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#3,687
of 36,494 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 916,777 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36,494 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.