You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Coalgebraic Methods in Computer Science
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 8 |
| Book title |
Coalgebraic Methods in Computer Science
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-40370-0_8 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-940369-4, 978-3-31-940370-0
|
| Authors |
Joost Winter, Winter, Joost |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,205,578
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#988
of 8,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,854
of 339,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#29
of 323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.