↓ Skip to main content

The Funnel: From the Skull Base to the Sacrum

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Evaluation of Adult and Pediatric Chiari Type 1 Malformation Patients: Do Consensus Documents Fit Everyday Practice?
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Evaluation of Adult and Pediatric Chiari Type 1 Malformation Patients: Do Consensus Documents Fit Everyday Practice?
Book title
The Funnel: From the Skull Base to the Sacrum
Published in
Acta neurochirurgica Supplement, December 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_24
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-136083-1, 978-3-03-136084-8
Authors

Valentini, Laura Grazia, Galbiati, Tommaso Francesco, Saletti, Veronica, Farinotti, Mariangela, Erbetta, Alessandra, Croci, Carolina, Vetrano, Ignazio Gaspare

Abstract

The management of Chiari 1 malformation (CM1) and Syringomyelia (Syr) has shown many changes in surgical indications and techniques over time. The dedicated neurosurgical and neurological community recently planned to analyze the state of the art and find conduct uniformity. This led to international consensus documents on diagnostic criteria and therapeutic strategies. We aimed to evaluate, in a large, monocentric surgical series of adult and children CM1 patients, if the daily clinical practice reflects the consensus documents. Our series comprises 190 pediatric and 220 adult Chiari patients submitted to surgery from 2000 to 2021. The main indications for the treatment were the presence of Syr and symptoms related to CM1. While there is great correspondence with the statements derived from the consensus documents about what to do for Syr and symptomatic CM1, the accordance is less evident in CM1 associated with craniosynostosis or hydrocephalus, especially when considering the early part of the series. However, we think that performing such studies could increase the homogeneity of surgical series, find a common way to evaluate long-term outcomes, and reinforce the comparability of different strategies adopted in different referral centers.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Neuroscience 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#22,471,971
of 25,069,047 outputs
Outputs from Acta neurochirurgica Supplement
#151
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#399,790
of 472,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta neurochirurgica Supplement
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,069,047 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them