↓ Skip to main content

Melanoma

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Melanoma
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 166)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Melanoma
Chapter number 1
Book title
Melanoma
Published in
Cancer treatment and research, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-22539-5_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-922538-8, 978-3-31-922539-5
Authors

Batool Shannan, Michela Perego, Rajasekharan Somasundaram, Meenhard Herlyn

Abstract

Melanoma is among the most aggressive and therapy-resistant human cancers. While great strides in therapy have generated enthusiasm, many challenges remain. Heterogeneity is the most pressing issue for all types of therapy. This chapter summarizes the clinical classification of melanoma, of which the research community now adds additional layers of classifications for better diagnosis and prediction of therapy response. As the search for new biomarkers increases, we expect that biomarker analyses will be essential for all clinical trials to better select patient populations for optimal therapy. While individualized therapy that is based on extensive biomarker analyses is an option, we expect in the future genetic and biologic biomarkers will allow grouping of melanomas in such a way that we can predict therapy outcome. At this time, tumor heterogeneity continues to be the major challenge leading inevitably to relapse. To address heterogeneity therapeutically, we need to develop complex therapies that eliminate the bulk of the tumor and, at the same time, the critical subpopulations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 23%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 27 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Cancer treatment and research
#39
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,102
of 387,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer treatment and research
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.