New Mechanism
Springer International Publishing
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Organisms Need Mechanisms; Mechanisms Need Organisms
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
New Mechanism
|
| Published in |
History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-031-46917-6_5 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-146916-9, 978-3-03-146917-6
|
| Authors |
Bechtel, William, Bich, Leonardo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 11% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 72% |
| Scientists | 20 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 1 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#837,331
of 26,161,782 outputs
Outputs from History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences
#4
of 60 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,926
of 377,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,161,782 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 60 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.