↓ Skip to main content

Viral Metagenomics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: The Oxford Nanopore MinION as a Versatile Technology for the Diagnosis and Characterization of Emerging Plant Viruses.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Oxford Nanopore MinION as a Versatile Technology for the Diagnosis and Characterization of Emerging Plant Viruses.
Book title
Viral Metagenomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2024
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3515-5_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163514-8, 978-1-07-163515-5
Authors

Tarquini, Giulia, Maestri, Simone, Ermacora, Paolo, Martini, Marta

Abstract

The emergence of novel viral epidemics that could affect major crops represents a serious threat to global food security. The early and accurate identification of the causative viral agent is the most important step for a rapid and effective response to disease outbreaks. Over the last years, the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) MinION sequencer has been proposed as an effective diagnostic tool for the early detection and identification of emerging viruses in plants, providing many advantages compared with different high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies. Here, we provide a step-by-step protocol that we optimized to obtain the virome of "Lamon bean" plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), an agricultural product with Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) in North-East of Italy, which is frequently subjected to multiple infections caused by different RNA viruses. The conversion of viral RNA in ds-cDNA enabled the use of Genomic DNA Ligation Sequencing Kit and Native Barcoding DNA Kit, which have been originally developed for DNA sequencing. This allowed the simultaneous diagnosis of both DNA- and RNA-based pathogens, providing a more versatile alternative to the use of direct RNA and/or direct cDNA sequencing kits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#15,765,159
of 24,963,265 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,645
of 14,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,111
of 82,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#29
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,963,265 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,033 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.