Wolbachia
Springer US
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Isolation of Phage WO Particles from Wolbachia-Infected Arthropods
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 20 |
| Book title |
Wolbachia
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-3553-7_20 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-163552-0, 978-1-07-163553-7
|
| Authors |
Bordenstein, Sarah R., Sarah R. Bordenstein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 32% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,255,742
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#621
of 14,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,678
of 360,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#4
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.