Plant-Virus Interactions
Springer US
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Experimental Transmission of Plant Viruses by Aphids or Whiteflies.
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
Plant-Virus Interactions
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-3485-1_12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-163484-4, 978-1-07-163485-1
|
| Authors |
Ontiveros, Irene, Diaz-Pendón, Juan Antonio, López-Moya, Juan José |
| Abstract |
Numerous species of plant viruses are naturally transmitted by insect vectors, mainly homopterans like aphids and whiteflies. Depending on the vector specificity and the mode of transmission, different durations of the periods for acquisition, retention, and inoculation are required for a successful transmission. Therefore, the experimental setup to perform controlled transmission experiments under laboratory conditions involves handling the vector organisms and managing the times for the different steps of the process to optimize and standardize the results. This chapter describes some basic procedures that can be applied to vector-mediated transmission experiments with selected viruses using aphids or whiteflies and different host plants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#17,038,804
of 25,038,941 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,919
of 14,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,003
of 133,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#82
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,038,941 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,091 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.