You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Quantitation of 25-OH-vitamin D (25OHD) using liquid tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS).
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 50 |
Book title |
Clinical Applications of Mass Spectrometry
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, December 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-60761-459-3_50 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-60761-458-6, 978-1-60761-459-3
|
Authors |
Singh RJ, Ravinder J. Singh, Singh, Ravinder J. |
Abstract |
25-OH-vitamin D (25OHD) is ordered and interpreted clinically in light of calcium balance and homeostasis. Various methodologies including immunoassay and chromatography are described for the measurement of 25OHD in biological fluids. It is well reported that all existing methods are challenging and require a high level of technical expertise. While this is also true of the methods using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS), the technique is gaining favor in various laboratories because it offers advantages of greatly improved specificity and sensitivity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 23% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
Chemistry | 2 | 15% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,705,927
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#927
of 13,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,277
of 163,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#12
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.