You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Image Captioning for Automated Grading and Understanding of Ulcerative Colitis
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 4 |
| Book title |
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-031-45350-2_4 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-145349-6, 978-3-03-145350-2
|
| Authors |
Valencia, Flor Helena, Flores-Araiza, Daniel, Cerda, Obed, Subramanian, Venkataraman, de Lange, Thomas, Ochoa-Ruiz, Gilberto, Ali, Sharib |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Mexico | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2023.
All research outputs
#14,992,148
of 24,579,513 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,209
of 8,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,948
of 171,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,579,513 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.