You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Community-level physiological profiling.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 16 |
| Book title |
Bioremediation
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-60761-439-5_16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-60761-440-1, 978-1-60761-439-5
|
| Authors |
Weber KP, Legge RL, Kela P. Weber, Raymond L. Legge, Weber, Kela P., Legge, Raymond L. |
| Abstract |
Community-level physiological profiling (CLPP) is a technique which offers an easily applied protocol yielding information regarding mixed microbial community function and functional adaptations over space and time. Different communities can be compared and classified based on sole carbon source utilization patterns (CSUPs) gathered using BIOLOG microplates. One of the most challenging aspects associated with the CLPP method is in the data analysis. This chapter describes the relatively simple CLPP laboratory protocol and provides a detailed description of different data analysis techniques. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 25% |
| Researcher | 32 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 34 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,194,368
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,851
of 13,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,346
of 94,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#22
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.