↓ Skip to main content

Comfrey root: from tradition to modern clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 438)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comfrey root: from tradition to modern clinical trials
Published in
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10354-012-0162-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christiane Staiger

Abstract

Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) has been used over many centuries as a medicinal plant. In particular, the use of the root has a longstanding tradition. Today, several randomised controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety. Comfrey root extract has been used for the topical treatment of painful muscle and joint complaints. It is clinically proven to relieve pain, inflammation and swelling of muscles and joints in the case of degenerative arthritis, acute myalgia in the back, sprains, contusions and strains after sports injuries and accidents, also in children aged 3 years and older. This paper provides information on clinical trials, non-interventional studies and further literature published on comfrey root till date.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 123 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 27%
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 8 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,662,845
of 24,068,839 outputs
Outputs from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#43
of 438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,086
of 285,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,068,839 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.