You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Elaeis guineensis Jacq. (oil palm) fluctuations in central Africa during the late Holocene: climate or human driving forces for this pioneering species?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, July 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/pl00006920 |
| Authors |
Jean Maley, with the collaboration of Alex Chepstow-Lusty |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,820,945
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#101
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,177
of 40,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them