↓ Skip to main content

PTSD Following Bereavement

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (Taylor & Francis Ltd), December 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PTSD Following Bereavement
Published in
Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (Taylor & Francis Ltd), December 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1022342028750
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sidney Zisook, Yulia Chentsova-Dutton, Stephen R. Shuchter

Abstract

Until quite recently, the only stressor considered consistent with the diagnosis of PTSD was a catastrophic, out of the ordinary, trauma that almost anyone could be expected to have a severe reaction to. Thus, PTSD was considered relatively rare among non-military populations. More recently, epidemiologic surveys have suggested that PTSD may be much more prevalent than heretofore recognized, and the DSM-IV has opened the door to a much larger variety of stressors (the "A" criterion). Yet, bereavement is not considered the type of stressor capable of producing PTSD. In this study, 350 newly bereaved widows and widowers were assessed for the prevalence of PTSD, its chronicity, comorbidity, and consequences. The diagnosis of PTSD was made on the basis of questionnaire items approximating the DSM-IV criteria for PTSD. At 2 months after the spouse's death, 10% of those whose spouses died after a chronic illness met criteria for PTSD, 9% of those whose spouses died unexpectedly met criteria, and 36% of those whose spouses died from "unnatural" causes (suicide or accident) had PTSD. Symptoms tended to be chronic in at least 40% of the subjects, almost always were associated with comorbid depression, and created substantial morbidity. The results suggested that PTSD may occur after bereavement, and, by extension, other stressors not recognized by official diagnostic systems. The "A" criterion needs further examination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Student > Bachelor 18 19%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2020.
All research outputs
#19,968,026
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#338
of 404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,991
of 109,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.