↓ Skip to main content

Computational Drug Discovery and Design

Overview of attention for book
Computational Drug Discovery and Design
Springer US
Attention for Chapter: Computer-Aided Drug Discovery and Design: Recent Advances and Future Prospects.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Computer-Aided Drug Discovery and Design: Recent Advances and Future Prospects.
Book title
Computational Drug Discovery and Design
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2024
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3441-7_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163440-0, 978-1-07-163441-7
Authors

Talevi, Alan

Abstract

Computer-aided drug discovery and design involve the use of information technologies to identify and develop, on a rational ground, chemical compounds that align a set of desired physicochemical and biological properties. In its most common form, it involves the identification and/or modification of an active scaffold (or the combination of known active scaffolds), although de novo drug design from scratch is also possible. Traditionally, the drug discovery and design processes have focused on the molecular determinants of the interactions between drug candidates and their known or intended pharmacological target(s). Nevertheless, in modern times, drug discovery and design are conceived as a particularly complex multiparameter optimization task, due to the complicated, often conflicting, property requirements.This chapter provides an updated overview of in silico approaches for identifying active scaffolds and guiding the subsequent optimization process. Recent groundbreaking advances in the field have also analyzed the integration of state-of-the-art machine learning approaches in every step of the drug discovery process (from prediction of target structure to customized molecular docking scoring functions), integration of multilevel omics data, and the use of a diversity of computational approaches to assist target validation and assess plausible binding pockets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#16,712,048
of 24,579,850 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,784
of 13,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,526
of 8,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,579,850 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.