You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Investigating Pangenome Graphs Using Wheat Panache.
|
---|---|
Book title |
Plant Genomic and Cytogenetic Databases
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-3389-2_2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-163388-5, 978-1-07-163389-2
|
Authors |
Bayer, Philipp E, Edwards, David, Bayer, Philipp E. |
Abstract |
Pangenome graphs quickly become the central data structure representing the diversity of variation we see across related genomes. Pangenome graphs have been published for some species, including plants of agronomic interest. However, visualizing these graphs is not easy as the graphs are large, and variants within these graphs are complex. Tools are needed to visualize graph data structures. Here, we present a workflow to search and visualize a wheat pangenome graph using Wheat Panache. The approach presented assists researchers interested in wheat genomics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#16,933,683
of 24,900,093 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,836
of 13,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,298
of 468,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#275
of 719 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,900,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,983 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 719 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.