↓ Skip to main content

Metagenomic Data Analysis

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Nanopore Sequencing Techniques: A Comparison of the MinKNOW and the Alignator Sequencers
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Nanopore Sequencing Techniques: A Comparison of the MinKNOW and the Alignator Sequencers
Chapter number 10
Book title
Methods in Molecular Biology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, June 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3072-3_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163071-6, 978-1-07-163072-3
Authors

Oeck, Sebastian, Tüns, Alicia I., Schramm, Alexander

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#20,809,834
of 26,436,676 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#8,669
of 14,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,275
of 400,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#88
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,436,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,467 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.