↓ Skip to main content

Bioinformatics Methods in Clinical Research

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 16: Analysis of biological processes and diseases using text mining approaches.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Analysis of biological processes and diseases using text mining approaches.
Chapter number 16
Book title
Bioinformatics Methods in Clinical Research
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60327-194-3_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60327-193-6, 978-1-60327-194-3
Authors

Krallinger M, Leitner F, Valencia A, Martin Krallinger, Florian Leitner, Alfonso Valencia, Krallinger, Martin, Leitner, Florian, Valencia, Alfonso

Abstract

A number of biomedical text mining systems have been developed to extract biologically relevant information directly from the literature, complementing bioinformatics methods in the analysis of experimentally generated data. We provide a short overview of the general characteristics of natural language data, existing biomedical literature databases, and lexical resources relevant in the context of biomedical text mining. A selected number of practically useful systems are introduced together with the type of user queries supported and the results they generate. The extraction of biological relationships, such as protein-protein interactions as well as metabolic and signaling pathways using information extraction systems, will be discussed through example cases of cancer-relevant proteins. Basic strategies for detecting associations of genes to diseases together with literature mining of mutations, SNPs, and epigenetic information (methylation) are described. We provide an overview of disease-centric and gene-centric literature mining methods for linking genes to phenotypic and genotypic aspects. Moreover, we discuss recent efforts for finding biomarkers through text mining and for gene list analysis and prioritization. Some relevant issues for implementing a customized biomedical text mining system will be pointed out. To demonstrate the usefulness of literature mining for the molecular oncology domain, we implemented two cancer-related applications. The first tool consists of a literature mining system for retrieving human mutations together with supporting articles. Specific gene mutations are linked to a set of predefined cancer types. The second application consists of a text categorization system supporting breast cancer-specific literature search and document-based breast cancer gene ranking. Future trends in text mining emphasize the importance of community efforts such as the BioCreative challenge for the development and integration of multiple systems into a common platform provided by the BioCreative Metaserver.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 6%
France 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Student > Master 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Professor 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 30%
Computer Science 23 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,724,226
of 23,707,131 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,040
of 13,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,914
of 169,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#37
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,707,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,361 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.