Attention for Chapter:
Quantitative Analysis of Latex Beads Phagocytosis by Human Macrophages Using Imaging Flow Cytometry with Extended Depth of Field (EDF).
Pavlova, Ekaterina, Shaposhnikova, Daria, Petrichuk, Svetlana, Radygina, Tatiana, Erokhina, Maria
Abstract
The existing methods of quantitative analysis of phagocytosis are characterized by a number of limitations. The usual method of manually counting phagocytosed objects on photographs obtained by confocal microscopy is very labor-intensive and time-consuming. As well, the resolution of conventional flow cytometry does not allow the fluorescence detection of a large number of phagocytosis objects. Thus, there is a need to combine the rapid analysis by flow cytometry and the visualization capability by confocal microscopy. This is possible due to imaging flow cytometry. However, until now, no protocols have allowed one to quantify phagocytosis at its high intensity. The present paper presents the developed and tested algorithm for assessing the level of phagocytic activity using flow cytometry with visualization and IDEAS software.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#17,560,565
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#6,121
of 14,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,134
of 479,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#287
of 714 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,341 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 714 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
