↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Applications of Nucleic Acid Amplification

Overview of attention for book
Clinical Applications of Nucleic Acid Amplification
Springer US
Attention for Chapter: Mate Pair Sequencing: Next-Generation Sequencing for Structural Variant Detection.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Mate Pair Sequencing: Next-Generation Sequencing for Structural Variant Detection.
Book title
Clinical Applications of Nucleic Acid Amplification
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-2950-5_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-162949-9, 978-1-07-162950-5
Authors

Pitel, Beth A, Zuckerman, Eric Zimmerman, Baughn, Linda B, Pitel, Beth A., Baughn, Linda B.

Abstract

Structural variant detection by next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods have a higher molecular resolution than conventional cytogenetic techniques (Aypar et al., Eur J Haematol 102(1):87-96, 2019; Smadbeck et al., Blood Cancer J 9(12):103, 2019) and are particularly helpful in characterizing genomic rearrangements. Mate pair sequencing (MPseq) leverages a unique library preparation chemistry involving circularization of long DNA fragments, allowing for a unique application of paired-end sequencing of reads that are expected to map 2-5 kb apart in the genome. The unique orientation of the reads allows the user to estimate the location of breakpoints involved in a structural variant either within the sequenced reads or between the two reads. The precision of structural variant and copy number detection by this method allows for characterization of cryptic and complex rearrangements that may be otherwise undetectable by conventional cytogenetic methods (Singh et al., Leuk Lymphoma 60(5):1304-1307, 2019; Peterson et al., Blood Adv 3(8):1298-1302, 2019; Schultz et al., Leuk Lymphoma 61(4):975-978, 2020; Peterson et al., Mol Case Studies 5(2), 2019; Peterson et al., Mol Case Studies 5(3), 2019).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 67%
Engineering 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,862,459
of 23,572,442 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,549
of 13,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,765
of 438,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#199
of 510 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,442 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,408 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 510 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.