You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Tissue-Specific CRISPR-Cas9 Screening in Drosophila
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
Drosophila
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-2541-5_7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-162540-8, 978-1-07-162541-5
|
| Authors |
Port, Fillip, Boutros, Michael |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 6 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
| Scientists | 9 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,997,230
of 24,302,917 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#282
of 13,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,908
of 508,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#14
of 814 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,302,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,671 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 814 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.