↓ Skip to main content

Rhodopsin

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Rhodopsin'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Microbial Rhodopsins
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Molecular Biology of Microbial Rhodopsins
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Rhodopsin-Based Optogenetics: Basics and Applications
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Searching Metagenomes for New Rhodopsins
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 E. coli Expression and Purification of Microbial and Viral Rhodopsins
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Crystallization of Microbial Rhodopsins
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Crystallographic Studies of Rhodopsins: Structure and Dynamics
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Time-Resolved UV-VIS Spectroscopy of Microbial Rhodopsins
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy on Microbial Rhodopsins
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 FTIR and Raman Spectroscopy of Rhodopsins.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Single-Cell Resolution Optogenetics Via Expression of Soma-Targeted Rhodopsins
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Electrophysiological Characterization of Microbial Rhodopsin Transport Properties: Electrometric and ΔpH Measurements Using Planar Lipid Bilayer, Collodion Film, and Fluorescent Probe Approaches
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Electrophysiological Characterization of Microbial Rhodopsins by Patch-Clamp Experiments
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Molecular Optimization of Rhodopsin-Based Tools for Neuroscience Applications.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Optogenetic Studies of Mitochondria
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 In Vivo and In Vitro Characterization of Cyclase and Phosphodiesterase Rhodopsins
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Optogenetic Control of Human Stem Cell-Derived Neurons
Attention for Chapter 1: Microbial Rhodopsins
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Microbial Rhodopsins
Chapter number 1
Book title
Rhodopsin
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2022
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-2329-9_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-162328-2, 978-1-07-162329-9
Authors

Gordeliy, Valentin, Kovalev, Kirill, Bamberg, Ernst, Rodriguez-Valera, Francisco, Zinovev, Egor, Zabelskii, Dmitrii, Alekseev, Alexey, Rosselli, Riccardo, Gushchin, Ivan, Okhrimenko, Ivan

Abstract

The first microbial rhodopsin, a light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin from Halobacterium salinarum (HsBR), was discovered in 1971. Since then, this seven-α-helical protein, comprising a retinal molecule as a cofactor, became a major driver of groundbreaking developments in membrane protein research. However, until 1999 only a few archaeal rhodopsins, acting as light-driven proton and chloride pumps and also photosensors, were known. A new microbial rhodopsin era started in 2000 when the first bacterial rhodopsin, a proton pump, was discovered. Later it became clear that there are unexpectedly many rhodopsins, and they are present in all the domains of life and even in viruses. It turned out that they execute such a diversity of functions while being "nearly the same." The incredible evolution of the research area of rhodopsins and the scientific and technological potential of the proteins is described in the review with a focus on their function-structure relationships.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 40%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 20%
Chemistry 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,249,114
of 24,127,822 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,159
of 13,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,734
of 506,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#88
of 814 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,127,822 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,611 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 814 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.