↓ Skip to main content

One-Carbon Feedstocks for Sustainable Bioproduction

Overview of attention for book
One-Carbon Feedstocks for Sustainable Bioproduction
Springer International Publishing
Attention for Chapter 176: Bioconversion of Methanol by Synthetic Methylotrophy.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Bioconversion of Methanol by Synthetic Methylotrophy.
Chapter number 176
Book title
One-Carbon Feedstocks for Sustainable Bioproduction
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, September 2021
DOI 10.1007/10_2021_176
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-106853-9, 978-3-03-106854-6
Authors

Guo, Feng, Zhang, Shangjie, Jiang, Yujia, Xu, Huixin, Xin, Fengxue, Zhang, Wenming, Jiang, Min, Feng Guo, Shangjie Zhang, Yujia Jiang, Huixin Xu, Fengxue Xin, Wenming Zhang, Min Jiang

Abstract

As an important building block in the chemical industry, methanol has become an attractive substrate in biorefinery owing to its abundance and low cost. With the development of synthetic biology, metabolic engineering of non-methylotrophy to construct synthetic methylotrophy has drawn increased attention. As for the metabolic construction of methanol assimilation pathway in some industrial hosts, several artificial methanol assimilation pathways have recently been designed and constructed based on the computer-aided design. Particularly, these artificial methanol assimilation pathways possess advantages of shorter reaction steps, stronger driving forces, and independence on oxygen. Accordingly, this chapter reviewed strategies of constructing synthetic methylotrophs, including introducing methanol metabolic modules derived from natural methylotrophs and designing artificial methanol assimilation pathways. Future challenges and prospects were also discussed.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 43%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#151
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,618
of 432,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.