Chapter title |
Combination Chemistry: Structure-Activity Relationships of Novel Psychoactive Cannabinoids.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 17 |
Book title |
Neuropharmacology of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS)
|
Published in |
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/7854_2016_17 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-952442-9, 978-3-31-952444-3
|
Authors |
Jenny L. Wiley, Julie A. Marusich, Brian F. Thomas, Wiley, Jenny L., Marusich, Julie A., Thomas, Brian F. |
Abstract |
Originally developed as research tools for use in structure-activity relationship studies, synthetic cannabinoids contributed to significant scientific advances in the cannabinoid field. Unfortunately, a subset of these compounds was diverted for recreational use beginning in the early 2000s. As these compounds were banned, they were replaced with additional synthetic cannabinoids with increasingly diverse chemical structures. This chapter focuses on integration of recent results with those covered in previous reviews. Whereas most of the early compounds were derived from the prototypic naphthoylindole JWH-018, currently popular synthetic cannabinoids include tetramethylcyclopropyl ketones and indazole-derived cannabinoids (e.g., AB-PINACA, AB-CHMINACA). Despite their structural differences, psychoactive synthetic cannabinoids bind with high affinity to CB1 receptors in the brain and, when tested, have been shown to activate these receptors and to produce a characteristic profile of effects, including suppression of locomotor activity, antinociception, hypothermia, and catalepsy, as well as Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-like discriminative stimulus effects in mice. When they have been tested, synthetic cannabinoids are often found to be more efficacious at activation of the CB1 receptor and more potent in vivo. Further, their chemical alteration by thermolysis during use and their uncertain stability and purity may result in exposure to degradants that differ from the parent compound contained in the original product. Consequently, while their intoxicant effects may be similar to those of THC, use of synthetic cannabinoids may be accompanied by unpredicted, and sometimes harmful, effects. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
Chemistry | 4 | 13% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 31% |