↓ Skip to main content

Peroxisomes

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Assessing Peroxisomal Protein Interaction by Immunoprecipitation.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Assessing Peroxisomal Protein Interaction by Immunoprecipitation.
Book title
Peroxisomes
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3048-8_24
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163047-1, 978-1-07-163048-8
Authors

Kors, Suzan, Schrader, Michael

Abstract

Organelles physically interact with each other via protein tethering complexes that bridge the opposing membranes. Organelle membrane contacts are highly dynamic, implying dynamism of the tethering complexes. Alterations in the binding of the tethering proteins can be assessed by immunoprecipitation. Antibody-conjugated beads allow for purification of the target protein with its binding partners, which can subsequently be examined by western blot analysis. We present immunoprecipitation methods and strategies to examine protein interaction domains, and for the identification of residues important for the regulation of the interaction, here focusing on phosphorylation. We use the peroxisomal membrane protein ACBD5 and its paralog ACBD4, which both bind ER membrane protein VAPB to mediate peroxisome-ER contacts, as example. However, this method can be applied to other peroxisomal and non-peroxisomal (membrane) proteins.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,126,232
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,168
of 13,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,684
of 439,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#42
of 510 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,339 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 510 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.