↓ Skip to main content

Pseudotyped Viruses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Pseudotyped Viruses for Retroviruses.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Pseudotyped Viruses for Retroviruses.
Chapter number 4
Book title
Pseudotyped Viruses
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-981-99-0113-5_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-990112-8, 978-9-81-990113-5
Authors

Solomon, Magan, Liang, Chen

Abstract

Since the discovery of retroviruses, their genome and replication strategies have been extensively studied, leading to the discovery of several unique features that make them invaluable vectors for virus pseudotyping, gene delivery, and gene therapy. Notably, retroviral vectors enable the integration of a gene of interest into the host genome, they can be used to stably transduce both dividing and nondividing cells, and they can deliver relatively large genes. Today, retroviral vectors are commonly used for many research applications and have become an active tool in gene therapy and clinical trials. This chapter will discuss the important features of the retroviral genome and replication cycle that are crucial for the development of retroviral vectors, the different retrovirus-based vector systems that are commonly used, and finally the research and clinical applications of retroviral vectors.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,175,776
of 23,861,036 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,608
of 5,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,334
of 436,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#27
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,861,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.