↓ Skip to main content

Pseudotyped Viruses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 17: Pseudotyped Virus for Flaviviridae.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Pseudotyped Virus for Flaviviridae.
Chapter number 17
Book title
Pseudotyped Viruses
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-981-99-0113-5_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-990112-8, 978-9-81-990113-5
Authors

Zhang, Leiliang, Wang, Xiao, Ming, Annan, Tan, Wenjie

Abstract

Members of Flaviviridae are enveloped single positive-stranded RNA viruses including hepacivirus, pestivirus, pegivirus, and mosquito-transmitted flavivirus, which are important pathogens of infectious diseases and pose serious threats to human health. Pseudotyped virus is an artificially constructed virus-like particle, which could infect host cells similar to a live virus but cannot produce infectious progeny virus. Therefore, pseudotyped virus has the advantages of a wide host range, high transfection efficiency, low biosafety risk, and accurate and objective quantification. It has been widely used in biological characteristics, drug screening, detection methods, and vaccine evaluation of Flaviviridae viruses like hepatitis C virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, dengue virus, and Zika virus.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,102,803
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,141
of 5,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,953
of 451,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#22
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.