You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Analyzing the Error Rates of Bitcoin Clustering Heuristics
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 11 |
Book title |
Advances in Digital Forensics XVIII
|
Published in |
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-031-10078-9_11 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-110077-2, 978-3-03-110078-9
|
Authors |
Gong, Yanan, Chow, Kam-Pui, Ting, Hing-Fung, Yiu, Siu-Ming |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,047,228
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,853
of 526,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them