Programming Languages and Systems
Springer Nature Switzerland
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Suspension Analysis and Selective Continuation-Passing Style for Higher-Order Probabilistic Programming Languages
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
Programming Languages and Systems
|
| Published in |
arXiv, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-031-57267-8_12 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-157266-1, 978-3-03-157267-8
|
| Authors |
Daniel Lundén, Lars Hummelgren, Jan Kudlicka, Oscar Eriksson, David Broman, Lundén, Daniel, Hummelgren, Lars, Kudlicka, Jan, Eriksson, Oscar, Broman, David |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,063,069
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#268,687
of 915,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,543
of 423,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#10,077
of 32,791 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 915,717 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32,791 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.