↓ Skip to main content

The Plant Cytoskeleton

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Expansion Microscopy of Plant Cells (PlantExM).
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Expansion Microscopy of Plant Cells (PlantExM).
Book title
The Plant Cytoskeleton
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-2867-6_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-162866-9, 978-1-07-162867-6
Authors

Hawkins, Timothy J, Robson, Joanne L, Cole, Bethany, Bush, Simon J, Timothy J. Hawkins, Joanne L. Robson, Bethany Cole, Simon J. Bush, Hawkins, Timothy J., Robson, Joanne L., Bush, Simon J.

Abstract

Expansion microscopy (ExM) achieves super-resolution imaging without the need for sophisticated super-resolution microscopy hardware through a combination of physical and optical magnification. Samples are fixed, stained, and embedded in a swellable gel. Following cross-linking of fluorophores to the gel matrix, the components of the sample are digested away and the gel expanded in water. Labeled objects which are too close to be resolved by diffraction-limited microscopy are moved far enough apart that these can now be resolved as individual objects on a standard confocal. Originally developed for animal cells and tissues, ExM for plants requires the additional consideration of cell wall digestion. Super-resolution can be limited in plants due to the size of cells, light scattering of tissues, and variations in refractive index. By removing the components which cause these limitations, ExM opens up the possibility of super-resolution at depth within plant tissues for the first time. Here we describe our method for PlantExM which is optimized for cytoskeleton resolution, which, when also coupled with compatible optical super-resolution technologies, can produce images of the plant cytoskeleton in unprecedented detail.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Professor 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Chemistry 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2023.
All research outputs
#14,281,082
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,543
of 14,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,801
of 478,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#82
of 722 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 722 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.