↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Vol. 165

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: The Cardiomyocyte Cell Cycle in Hypertrophy, Tissue Homeostasis, and Regeneration.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Cardiomyocyte Cell Cycle in Hypertrophy, Tissue Homeostasis, and Regeneration.
Chapter number 12
Book title
Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Vol. 165
Published in
Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/112_2013_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-900998-8, 978-3-31-900999-5
Authors

Zebrowski DC, Engel FB, David C. Zebrowski, Felix B. Engel, Zebrowski, David C., Engel, Felix B.

Abstract

Mammalian cardiomyocytes withdraw from the cell cycle shortly after birth. Although the adult heart is unable to regenerate, numerous reports have shown that adult cardiomyocytes exhibit a dynamic range of cell cycle activity under various physiological and pathological conditions. Reason and consequence of cardiomyocyte cell cycle activity remain unclear and have led to a number of misconceptions. Understanding the scenarios in which cycling happens may promote new perspectives on the differentiated state of cardiomyocytes, treatments for hypertrophy, heart regeneration and cancer therapy. In this review we discuss the result of cardiomyocyte cell cycle activity in aging and disease and studies manipulating cardiac cell cycle activity to promote cardiac regeneration. In addition, we focus on cardiomyocyte differentiation, cell cycle exit, and the relationship between ploidy and regenerative potential. Finally, we provide observations that may further advance the goal of inducing adult mammalian heart regeneration through cardiomyocyte proliferation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 31%
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Engineering 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 9 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,270,698
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology
#64
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,426
of 197,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.