You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Approach to Investigate Plant–Fungal Interactions
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 16 |
Book title |
Methods in Molecular Biology
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, December 2022
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-2871-3_16 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-162870-6, 978-1-07-162871-3
|
Authors |
Fracchia, F., Basso, V., Guinet, F., Veneault-Fourrey, C., Deveau, Aurélie, F. Fracchia, V. Basso, F. Guinet, C. Veneault-Fourrey, Aurélie Deveau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Researcher | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,220,886
of 25,365,817 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,033
of 14,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,615
of 484,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#30
of 716 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,365,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 716 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.