↓ Skip to main content

Vaccine Adjuvants

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Vaccine Adjuvants'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Immunology of vaccine adjuvants.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Preclinical Development of AS04
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Nonclinical Safety Assessment of Vaccines and Adjuvants
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Aluminum Adjuvants: Preparation, Application, Dosage, and Formulation with Antigen
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Freund’s Complete and Incomplete Adjuvants, Preparation, and Quality Control Standards for Experimental Laboratory Animals Use
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Liposomal Adjuvants: Preparation and Formulation with Antigens
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Micro/Nanoparticle Adjuvants: Preparation and Formulation with Antigens
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Adjuvant Activity on Human Cells In Vitro
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Adjuvant Activity on Murine and Human Macrophages
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 In Vitro Effects of Adjuvants on B Cells
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 NKT Cell Responses to Glycolipid Activation
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Tracking Dendritic Cells In Vivo
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Adjuvant Effects on Antibody Titre
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Functional Antibody Assays
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Determining Adjuvant Activity on T-Cell Function In Vivo: Th Cells
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Quantitative Multiparameter Assays to Measure the Effect of Adjuvants on Human Antigen-Specific CD8 T-Cell Responses
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Large-Animal Model for Establishing E/T Ratio of Adjuvants
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Determining the Activity of Mucosal Adjuvants
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Vaccine Adjuvants
Attention for Chapter 1: Immunology of vaccine adjuvants.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Immunology of vaccine adjuvants.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Vaccine Adjuvants
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-585-9_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60761-584-2, 978-1-60761-585-9
Authors

Ribeiro CM, Schijns VE, Carla M.S. Ribeiro, Virgil E.J.C. Schijns, Ribeiro, Carla M.S., Schijns, Virgil E.J.C.

Abstract

In recent times vaccine adjuvants, or immunopotentiators, received abundant attention in the media as critical ingredients of current and future vaccines. Indeed, vaccine adjuvants are recognized to make the difference between competing vaccines based on identical antigens. Moreover, it is recognized that vaccines designed for certain indications require a matching combination of selected antigen(s) together with a critical immunopotentiator that selectively drives the required immune pathway with minimal adverse reactions. Recently, the mechanistic actions of some immunopotentiators have become clearer as a result of research focused on innate immunity receptors. These insights enable more rational adjuvant and vaccine design, which, ideally, is based on predictable immunophenotypes following vaccination.This chapter addresses immunopotentiators, classed according to their (presumed) mechanisms of action. They are categorized functionally in two major groups as facilitators of signal 1 and/or signal 2. The mode(s) of action of some well-known adjuvant prototypes is discussed in the context of this classification.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Student > Master 9 21%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2010.
All research outputs
#5,621,885
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,550
of 13,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,783
of 164,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#22
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,078 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.