↓ Skip to main content

Preface.

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 303: E. coli as an All-Rounder: The Thin Line Between Commensalism and Pathogenicity.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
535 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
E. coli as an All-Rounder: The Thin Line Between Commensalism and Pathogenicity.
Chapter number 303
Book title
Between Pathogenicity and Commensalism
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/82_2012_303
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-236559-1, 978-3-64-236560-7
Authors

Leimbach A, Hacker J, Dobrindt U, Andreas Leimbach, Jörg Hacker, Ulrich Dobrindt, Leimbach, Andreas, Hacker, Jörg, Dobrindt, Ulrich

Abstract

Escherichia coli is a paradigm for a versatile bacterial species which comprises harmless commensal as well as different pathogenic variants with the ability to either cause intestinal or extraintestinal diseases in humans and many animal hosts. Because of this broad spectrum of lifestyles and phenotypes, E. coli is a well-suited model organism to study bacterial evolution and adaptation to different growth conditions and niches. The geno- and phenotypic diversity, however, also hampers risk assessment and strain typing. A marked genome plasticity is the key to the great variability seen in this species. Acquisition of genetic information by horizontal gene transfer, gene loss as well as other genomic modifications, like DNA rearrangements and point mutations, can constantly alter the genome content and thus the fitness and competitiveness of individual variants in certain niches. Specific gene subsets and traits have been correlated with an increased potential of E. coli strains to cause intestinal or extraintestinal disease. Intestinal pathogenic E. coli strains can be reliably discriminated from non-pathogenic, commensal, or from extraintestinal E. coli pathogens based on genome content and phenotypic traits. An unambiguous distinction of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli and commensals is, nevertheless, not so easy, as strains with the ability to cause extraintestinal infection are facultative pathogens and belong to the normal flora of many healthy individuals. Here, we compare insights into phylogeny, geno-, and phenotypic traits of commensal and pathogenic E. coli. We demonstrate that the borderline between extraintestinal virulence and intestinal fitness can be blurred as improved adaptability and competitiveness may promote intestinal colonization as well as extraintestinal infection by E. coli.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 535 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 527 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 97 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 12%
Student > Master 65 12%
Researcher 41 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 6%
Other 43 8%
Unknown 191 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 97 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 59 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 2%
Other 54 10%
Unknown 206 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,573,531
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#380
of 715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,710
of 294,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#25
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.