↓ Skip to main content

Hepatitis C Virus: From Molecular Virology to Antiviral Therapy

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Liver injury and disease pathogenesis in chronic hepatitis C.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Liver injury and disease pathogenesis in chronic hepatitis C.
Chapter number 11
Book title
Hepatitis C Virus: From Molecular Virology to Antiviral Therapy
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-27340-7_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-227339-1, 978-3-64-227340-7
Authors

Daisuke Yamane, David R. McGivern, Takahiro Masaki, Stanley M. Lemon

Abstract

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of liver-specific morbidity and mortality in humans, including progressive liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. It has also been associated with altered function in other organs, including those of the endocrine, hematopoietic, and nervous systems. Disease results from both direct regulation of cellular metabolism and signaling pathways by viral proteins as well as indirect consequences of the host response to HCV infection, including inflammatory responses stemming from immune recognition of the virus. Recent in vitro studies have begun to reveal molecular mechanisms responsible for virus-induced changes in cell metabolism and cellular kinase cascades that culminate in pathologic consequences in the liver, such as steatosis, insulin resistance, and carcinogenesis. Here we discuss how these findings may be relevant to disease pathogenesis in patients, and suggest future directions in the field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 73 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,746,859
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#417
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,253
of 280,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#26
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.