You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Bulk Sequencing from mRNA with UMI for Evaluation of B-Cell Isotype and Clonal Evolution: A Method by the AIRR Community
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
Immunogenetics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-2115-8_19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-162114-1, 978-1-07-162115-8
|
| Authors |
Nidhi Gupta, Susanna Marquez, Cinque Soto, Elaine C. Chen, Magnolia L. Bostick, Ulrik Stervbo, Andrew Farmer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#16,086,029
of 23,863,389 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,600
of 13,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,578
of 442,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#171
of 433 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,863,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 433 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.