Nanotoxicology in Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials
Springer International Publishing
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Drosophila as a Suitable In Vivo Model in the Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
Nanotoxicology in Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-88071-2_12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-088070-5, 978-3-03-088071-2
|
| Authors |
Demir, Eşref, Demir, Fatma Turna, Marcos, Ricard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#18,323,929
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,178
of 5,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,777
of 442,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#16
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.