African Swine Fever Virus
Springer US
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
African Swine Fever Virus Hemadsorption Inhibition Assay.
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
African Swine Fever Virus
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-2333-6_11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-162332-9, 978-1-07-162333-6
|
| Authors |
Malogolovkin, Alexander, Sereda, Alexey, Alexander Malogolovkin, Alexey Sereda |
| Abstract |
Adsorption of red blood cells (hemadsorption) on the surface of macrophages infected with African swine fever virus (ASFV) is a unique phenomenon allowing to determine virus infectious titer in hemadsorption unit (HAU) and differentiate virus strains phenotypically. In the meantime, hemadsorption of particular ASFV strain can by inhibited by homologous anti-ASFV serum containing antibody to the serogroup-specific virus protein (CD2v). Here, we describe a hemadsorption inhibition assay (HADIA) to phenotype ASFV strains to one of the known nine serogroups using blood-derived swine macrophages. The HADIA is a powerful method in the ASFV immunopathology and vaccine research since it provides additional antigenic and phenotypic characteristics of virus strains that can't be defined by other assays. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#13,520,222
of 23,800,390 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,471
of 13,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,731
of 515,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#127
of 818 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,800,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,439 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 818 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.