↓ Skip to main content

A History of Force Feeding

Overview of attention for book
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
34 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A History of Force Feeding
Published by
Springer International Publishing, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-31113-5
Pubmed ID
ISBNs
978-3-31-931112-8, 978-3-31-931113-5
Authors

Miller, Ian

Abstract

It is the first monograph-length study of the force-feeding of hunger strikers in English, Irish and Northern Irish prisons. It examines ethical debates that arose throughout the twentieth century when governments authorised the force-feeding of imprisoned suffragettes, Irish republicans and convict prisoners. It also explores the fraught role of prison doctors called upon to perform the procedure. Since the Home Office first authorised force-feeding in 1909, a number of questions have been raised about the procedure. Is force-feeding safe? Can it kill? Are doctors who feed prisoners against their will abandoning the medical ethical norms of their profession? And do state bodies use prison doctors to help tackle political dissidence at times of political crisis?

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 23%
Researcher 5 14%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 8 23%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 9 26%
Arts and Humanities 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 8 23%