You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Methods to Establish Drosophila Cell Lines.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 21 |
Book title |
Drosophila
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_21 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6369-0, 978-1-4939-6371-3
|
Authors |
Alain Debec, Timothy L. Megraw, Antoine Guichet |
Editors |
Christian Dahmann |
Abstract |
Hundreds of Drosophila cell lines have been established in the labs of many researchers over the last decades and have been important tools for research. Although these cells often deviate from normal cell physiology and genetic composition, such systems nonetheless are powerful models for biochemical, cell biological, and genetics studies that are experimentally difficult in vivo. While published descriptions of cell line generation are available in the literature, how to generate new Drosophila cell lines can be challenging for beginners. Here, we describe a detailed, simple protocol to establish new Drosophila cell lines. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 19% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 31% |
Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2016.
All research outputs
#5,765,421
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,628
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,606
of 393,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#207
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.