↓ Skip to main content

Plant Gene Silencing

Overview of attention for book
Plant Gene Silencing
Springer US
Attention for Chapter: Recent Advances in Plant Gene Silencing Methods
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Recent Advances in Plant Gene Silencing Methods
Book title
Plant Gene Silencing
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2022
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-1875-2_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-161874-5, 978-1-07-161875-2
Authors

Pandey, Prachi, Mysore, Kirankumar S, Senthil-Kumar, Muthappa, Mysore, Kirankumar S., Prachi Pandey, Kirankumar S. Mysore, Muthappa Senthil-Kumar

Abstract

With the increasing understanding of fundamentals of gene silencing pathways in plants, various tools and techniques for downregulating the expression of a target gene have been developed across multiple plant species. This chapter provides an insight into the molecular mechanisms of gene silencing and highlights the advancements in various gene silencing approaches. The prominent aspects of different gene silencing methods, their advantages and disadvantages have been discussed. A succinct discussion on the newly emerged microRNA-based technologies like microRNA-induced gene silencing (MIGS) and microRNA-mediated virus-induced gene silencing (MIR-VIGS) are also presented. We have also discussed the gene-editing system like CRISPR-Cas. The prominent bottlenecks in gene silencing methods are the off-target effects and lack of universal applicability. However, the tremendous growth in understanding of this field reflects the potentials for improvements in the currently available approaches and the development of new widely applicable methods for easy, fast, and efficient functional characterization of plant genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Chemical Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#13,869,562
of 23,500,709 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,779
of 13,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,712
of 512,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#153
of 819 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,500,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 819 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.