You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Approaches to Understanding Visual Illusions
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 10 |
| Book title |
Computational and Cognitive Neuroscience of Vision
|
| Published in |
Cognitive Science and Technology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-981-10-0213-7_10 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-9-81-100211-3, 978-9-81-100213-7
|
| Authors |
Chun Siong Soon, Rachit Dubey, Egor Ananyev, Po-Jang Hsieh |
| Editors |
Qi Zhao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 39% |
| Researcher | 4 | 22% |
| Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 5 | 28% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 11% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,785,110
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Science and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,629
of 329,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Science and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them