↓ Skip to main content

Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: Prophylactic antibiotics and anticonvulsants in neurosurgery
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Prophylactic antibiotics and anticonvulsants in neurosurgery
Chapter number 6
Book title
Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery
Published in
Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-3-7091-0179-7_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-70-910178-0, 978-3-70-910179-7
Authors

C. Sampaio, B. Ratilal

Abstract

The prophylactic administration of antibiotics to prevent infection and the prophylactic administration of anticonvulsants to prevent first seizure episodes are common practice in neurosurgery. If prophylactic medication therapy is not indicated, the patient not only incurs the discomfort and the inconvenience resulting from drug treatment but is also unnecessarily exposed to adverse drug reactions, and incurs extra costs. The main situations in which prophylactic anticonvulsants and antibiotics are used are described and those situations we found controversial in the literature and lack further investigation are identified: anticonvulsants for preventing seizures in patients with chronic subdural hematomas, antiepileptic drugs for preventing seizures in those suffering from brain tumors, antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing meningitis in patients with basilar skull fractures, and antibiotic prophylaxis for the surgical introduction of intracranial ventricular shunts.In the following we present systematic reviews of the literature in accordance with the standard protocol of The Cochrane Collaboration to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of these prophylactic medications in the situations mentioned. Our goal was to efficiently integrate valid information and provide a basis for rational decision-making.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 20%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 8 23%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 46%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2013.
All research outputs
#20,180,477
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery
#13
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,911
of 180,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.