You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
How did software get so reliable without proof?
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 77 |
| Book title |
FME'96: Industrial Benefit and Advances in Formal Methods
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-60973-3_77 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-060973-5, 978-3-54-049749-3
|
| Authors |
C. A. R. Hoare, Hoare, C. A. R. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 59 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 46 | 69% |
| Engineering | 8 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,575,565
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,632
of 8,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,054
of 81,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.