You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
In-place Heap Construction with Optimized Comparisons, Moves, and Cache Misses
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 25 |
Book title |
Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2012
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-32589-2_25 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-232588-5, 978-3-64-232589-2
|
Authors |
Jingsen Chen, Stefan Edelkamp, Amr Elmasry, Jyrki Katajainen |
Editors |
Branislav Rovan, Vladimiro Sassone, Peter Widmayer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
Researcher | 1 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 4 | 57% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,487,737
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,487
of 8,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,925
of 244,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#148
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.